<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Digital Distribution Useless?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/</link>
	<description>Latest Video News and Discussion from Videomaker Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:22:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Chutry Experiment &#187; Friday Links</title>
		<link>http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-9267</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chutry Experiment &#187; Friday Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/#comment-9267</guid>
		<description>[...] has a roundup of a discussion on whether &#8220;digital distribution&#8221; is useless.  Until we begin figuring [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a roundup of a discussion on whether &#8220;digital distribution&#8221; is useless.  Until we begin figuring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Film Directing and Film Making Tips for the Independent Filmmaker &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Digital Distribution Useless?</title>
		<link>http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-9262</link>
		<dc:creator>Film Directing and Film Making Tips for the Independent Filmmaker &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Digital Distribution Useless?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/#comment-9262</guid>
		<description>[...] This article is from Videomaker. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This article is from Videomaker. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomskowronski</title>
		<link>http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-9223</link>
		<dc:creator>tomskowronski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/#comment-9223</guid>
		<description>It is true that not having something solid, to be able to hold in your hand makes things feel like they hold less value. And it&#039;s also true that when technologies change, so does society. For instance, I cant remember the last time that I wrote a letter... however, I write 30 emails a day! And may be you&#039;re right concerning the MASSES...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that not having something solid, to be able to hold in your hand makes things feel like they hold less value. And it&#8217;s also true that when technologies change, so does society. For instance, I cant remember the last time that I wrote a letter&#8230; however, I write 30 emails a day! And may be you&#8217;re right concerning the MASSES&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lasereye</title>
		<link>http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-9222</link>
		<dc:creator>Lasereye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/#comment-9222</guid>
		<description>I think it’s a matter of time and innovation as this technological paradyne shift ripples through mass communication. For example, we see the newspaper world morphing into online news with major shifts in logistics and cost. No more printing presses with dedicated operators and maintenance, No more of the infrastructure of cutting trees, making giant paper rolls, slicing, dicing of ink filled pages, cut and folded into compact, rectangular stacks.  No more delivery by trucks, cars and people, with its intrinsic cost of distribution, to the doors and steps of homes and offices.

Now on the Internet we have instant news from a plethora of interpretations and points of view.  The days of believing what you read in the newspaper is history!  Now we are in a brave new world where we are required to think for ourselves using critical thinking to really comprehend the real truth of reality we live instead of someone else’s interpretation.

So the same goes for the visual mass media. What I have noticed is a coming together of media types which in the pass were separate entities or businesses. For example the digital still and video cameras are merging into one device.  We are witnesses the revolution in personal digital assistants that fit in our pockets incorporating all media types we once knew as newspapers, books, broadcast TV and movie theatres.  Even here, the technical production cost of content and distribution will continue to fall due to ever expanding technological changes.  A cost/benefit point of value will eventually be reached for media communications or the product or service will simple not exist as a profitable communication medium. Maybe we are witnessing a true democracy among people taking place, where everyone can speak in any format they choose.  Maybe we are witnessing the pyramid of power of broadcasting down to the masses being transformed into a greater conscious of mankind on the planet; freeing us from the machinations of the few who want to control and dominate to the detriment of us all.  Maybe, instead of looking at the MASSES to make a fast buck; just maybe, instead of using money to buy things, we use our resources to create better ideas that benefit the planet we live on for future generations. Just maybe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s a matter of time and innovation as this technological paradyne shift ripples through mass communication. For example, we see the newspaper world morphing into online news with major shifts in logistics and cost. No more printing presses with dedicated operators and maintenance, No more of the infrastructure of cutting trees, making giant paper rolls, slicing, dicing of ink filled pages, cut and folded into compact, rectangular stacks.  No more delivery by trucks, cars and people, with its intrinsic cost of distribution, to the doors and steps of homes and offices.</p>
<p>Now on the Internet we have instant news from a plethora of interpretations and points of view.  The days of believing what you read in the newspaper is history!  Now we are in a brave new world where we are required to think for ourselves using critical thinking to really comprehend the real truth of reality we live instead of someone else’s interpretation.</p>
<p>So the same goes for the visual mass media. What I have noticed is a coming together of media types which in the pass were separate entities or businesses. For example the digital still and video cameras are merging into one device.  We are witnesses the revolution in personal digital assistants that fit in our pockets incorporating all media types we once knew as newspapers, books, broadcast TV and movie theatres.  Even here, the technical production cost of content and distribution will continue to fall due to ever expanding technological changes.  A cost/benefit point of value will eventually be reached for media communications or the product or service will simple not exist as a profitable communication medium. Maybe we are witnessing a true democracy among people taking place, where everyone can speak in any format they choose.  Maybe we are witnessing the pyramid of power of broadcasting down to the masses being transformed into a greater conscious of mankind on the planet; freeing us from the machinations of the few who want to control and dominate to the detriment of us all.  Maybe, instead of looking at the MASSES to make a fast buck; just maybe, instead of using money to buy things, we use our resources to create better ideas that benefit the planet we live on for future generations. Just maybe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelestialBeing</title>
		<link>http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-9214</link>
		<dc:creator>CelestialBeing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videomaker.com/community/blogs/videonews/2009/03/4300-is-digital-distribution-useless/#comment-9214</guid>
		<description>I think the problem with why digital distribution does not retain the same sales figures as DVD or even VHS sales is the simple fact there is no physical format. When you pay for a movie on itunes you then get to download a file. You just payed $9 for a bunch of 1&#039;s and 0&#039;s. I remember back when I was a kid that whenever I bought a VHS tape I felt like I had actually &quot;bought something&quot; because It had solid form. The money I spent I could then &quot;see&quot; in a solid form. With digital music or movie files there is no solid tangible form so as a consumer I feel like I&#039;m being taken when I pay $9 for a Disney movie on itunes. Why should I pay for a bunch of 1&#039;s and 0&#039;s? Mix magazine did a poll a while back online and found that the overwhelming majority did not believe they should pay for online music. LP sales have shot up because they are a physical manifestation. Someone walks in my room, sees a bunch of LP&#039;s and knows I&#039;m a music lover. Downloading movies onto a hard drive leaves no huge collection to show off or be proud of. I&#039;m not against making money online through digital downloads but I&#039;m concerned that I don&#039;t see many making money with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem with why digital distribution does not retain the same sales figures as DVD or even VHS sales is the simple fact there is no physical format. When you pay for a movie on itunes you then get to download a file. You just payed $9 for a bunch of 1&#8217;s and 0&#8217;s. I remember back when I was a kid that whenever I bought a VHS tape I felt like I had actually &#8220;bought something&#8221; because It had solid form. The money I spent I could then &#8220;see&#8221; in a solid form. With digital music or movie files there is no solid tangible form so as a consumer I feel like I&#8217;m being taken when I pay $9 for a Disney movie on itunes. Why should I pay for a bunch of 1&#8217;s and 0&#8217;s? Mix magazine did a poll a while back online and found that the overwhelming majority did not believe they should pay for online music. LP sales have shot up because they are a physical manifestation. Someone walks in my room, sees a bunch of LP&#8217;s and knows I&#8217;m a music lover. Downloading movies onto a hard drive leaves no huge collection to show off or be proud of. I&#8217;m not against making money online through digital downloads but I&#8217;m concerned that I don&#8217;t see many making money with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
