<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Forums Topic: Final Cut Pro - Video Quality, what's the best but smallest?</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Forums Topic: Final Cut Pro - Video Quality, what's the best but smallest?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:08:51 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Jag on "Final Cut Pro - Video Quality, what's the best but smallest?"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/final-cut-pro-video-quality-whats-the-best-but-smallest#post-33539</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jag</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33539@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It's all good.  Great product
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chrisv39 on "Final Cut Pro - Video Quality, what's the best but smallest?"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/final-cut-pro-video-quality-whats-the-best-but-smallest#post-32941</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chrisv39</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32941@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;cfulton Wrote:&#60;/p&#62;&#60;blockquote&#62;This is kind of a slow forum, but good things come to the patient. (Welcome all the same--we're glad you're here.)&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;br /&#62;
The first codec that comes to mind is H.264. You could drop the clips in question into Compressor and convert away; the resulting clips will be half the size (or possibly even smaller). But it'll take a while, depending on the speed of your Macintosh.&#60;/blockquote&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;br /&#62;
Is there any codec that it will keep the resolution almost the same, could be even a tad smaller and be compressed to a lower file size? Because I converted this one file, used to be 11GB, then when I output it in Final Cut, I check marked the Recompress frames or something like that, and it is now 610MB and its really nice quality. By me putting a check mark beside that option, what did it do really?</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>cfulton on "Final Cut Pro - Video Quality, what's the best but smallest?"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/final-cut-pro-video-quality-whats-the-best-but-smallest#post-32940</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cfulton</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32940@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>This is kind of a slow forum, but good things come to the patient. (Welcome all the same--we're glad you're here.)&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;br /&#62;
The first codec that comes to mind is H.264. You could drop the clips in question into Compressor and convert away; the resulting clips will be half the size (or possibly even smaller). But it'll take a while, depending on the speed of your Macintosh.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chrisv39 on "Final Cut Pro - Video Quality, what's the best but smallest?"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/final-cut-pro-video-quality-whats-the-best-but-smallest#post-32934</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chrisv39</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32934@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>Come on, help me please!</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>chrisv39 on "Final Cut Pro - Video Quality, what's the best but smallest?"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/final-cut-pro-video-quality-whats-the-best-but-smallest#post-32927</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chrisv39</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32927@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>I was wondering, I am converting some dvd quality scenes in my sequence and if I convert them with the current settings it comes out to 11 GB. I was wondering, what is still really good quality but small file sizes? Please help.</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
