<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Forums Topic: Analog to Digital converter suggestion... PLEASE!</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Forums Topic: Analog to Digital converter suggestion... PLEASE!</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:03:14 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Coreece on "Analog to Digital converter suggestion... PLEASE!"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/analog-to-digital-converter-suggestion-please#post-38259</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Coreece</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38259@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The converters recommended by johnboy are by far the best converters, but if you were to use a digital 8 camcorder as the converter, it will cost less and produce the same quality if not better.  I doubt you'll be able to find a digital 8 camcorder in a retail store, but perhaps a friend has one you can borrow, or you could just pick one up on ebay or a pawn shop for around $50-$100.  Many Sony Digital 8's can play back Hi8, but some cannot.  Just check the specs and it will tell you. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I like this method because if you use the canopus converter, you have to send the signal through A/V cables to the converter and than from the converter to the computer via a firewire IEEE 1394 cable.  When the signal passes through the A/V cables there will be a slight loss in quality.  If you use the Digital 8, the signal travels directly to the computer from the camera via firewire without having to use the additional llossy A/V cables.  In addition, the canopus converter costs around $200 and can't be used for anything else.  The Digital 8 camcorder is cheaper and now you have an extra camera for whatever.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; Best Regards,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; Corey&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Johnboy on "Analog to Digital converter suggestion... PLEASE!"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/analog-to-digital-converter-suggestion-please#post-38256</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Johnboy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38256@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Canopus/Grass Valley ADVC 110 or 300&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>californiagreen on "Analog to Digital converter suggestion... PLEASE!"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/analog-to-digital-converter-suggestion-please#post-38252</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>californiagreen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38252@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I've spent the last six hours reading up on converters, frame rates, formats, compression et. al.  but have not been able to answer one simple question;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What converters don't lose any video quality?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm converting hi-8 analog from a Sony TVR65, and I don't want to do it twice.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Please, please, please, someone make a suggestion.  This has to be one of the most common projects on the planet.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks!!!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;-Sherman&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
