<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Videomaker Forums &#187; Topic: Serif MOVIEPLUS X3</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Videomaker Forums &#187; Topic: Serif MOVIEPLUS X3</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:11:25 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>tomskowronski on "Serif MOVIEPLUS X3"</title>
<link>http://videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/serif-movieplus-x3#post-44242</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tomskowronski</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">44242@http://videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Â Is quickly becoming one of my new favs to edit with... why is it that everyone assumes CS4, AVID &#38;amp; Final Cut are the end all be all in the editing process? I personally, like the idea of spending 80 bucks on a program like this. It's offers a ton of customization options &#38;amp; is extremly user friendly! The only big difference is that with titles &#38;amp; effects (chromakey) CS4 obviously offers more... but whadya you think?&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
